...Of the game and console variety. BEHOLD:
Dazzling 3d DRAPHICS, huh?
Remember Metall Slug? Best game ever am I right?
TRY AND COUNT HOW MANY THINGS ARE WRONG WITH THIS
Conker..?
Nintendo 64
Compact Disc
Que?
I love my NINTENDO POLYSTATION
I think I've seen this on a market stall before.
Superior to the Dreamcast
OH GOD POLYSTATION 2, with Goku and Jigglypuff SHIT YES
Help, it won't stop..!
Er, have you played your SexBox 3600円 today?
Costume x1 Igniter [???] x1 Lotion x1
...And those must be the games for it above. Also, Microchinco - chinco - chinko = Japanese word for penis. Okay, I laughed. Unfortunately it's not a real console, but some crazy sex kit in disguise, probably a typical example of what you'd find in Akihabara.
Also, what the fuck, Japan? Are those mini-hamburgers and broccolli on pizza?
The Shrimp and Mayonnaise Roll Winter Double King Pizza from Pizza Hut. This amazing amalgamation is filled with crab, shrimp, beef, scrambled eggs, onion, broccoli, mayo and a demi-glace sauce. And the exterior crust is filled with shrimp filled with mayonnaise.
Mmmmm.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/4370072/New-pornography-laws-could-make-comic-books-illegal-claim-campaigners.html
More badly thought-out laws that will probably never get passed. Could this be any more vague?
“The Government defines an "extreme image" as any "grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise ... obscene" moving or still depiction of someone any "reasonable person" would think real being sexually injured or engaging in sexual activity with an animal or corpse.”
Why the hell are people worried about comic books? No “reasonable person” would think they’re real, unless they’re part of the Australian legal system*. I don’t remember Batman going around raping animals either.
“"A kick in the balls or a--- would constitute this, and a kick in the balls is a well trodden part of humour."”
Did they miss the part where it stated images “solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal” would only be affected? This is such a load of rubbish. You can say the only people worried about this are the guilty ones, but these fascist laws just encourage censorship and stupid fucking paedophile fanaticism. Catching actual criminals is the most important thing, and it’s never even been proven that looking at drawings is linked with real crime, so it would probably be wasted efforts anyway.
Disregarding the content of that kind of material, the difference between fiction and reality is the thing here that seems to be getting confused more and more. 'Extreme, disgusting images' is so subjective it makes me uncomfortable to think that what would fall into that category would be totally dependant on the personal tastes of one person. God, just stop the circulation of images of REAL children and real exploitation before worrying about what Kaworu Watashiya writes next. This kind of thing really pisses me off because it just seems like obvious scapegoating.
*This Neil Gaiman blog entry explains some things. I’m fond of this line:
“And, I should warn members of the Australian judiciary, fictional characters don't just have sex. Sometimes they murder each other, and take fictional drugs, and are cruel to fictional animals, and throw fictional babies off roofs. Crimes, crime everywhere.”
Lol.
